Although physics research knows that the nuclear force is one hundred times greater than the electromagnetic force.
However, physics does not know what the substance is that generates nuclear force, and it does not know what substance generates nuclear energy.
Or in what form of matter nuclear energy is stored in the nucleus.
The essence of various forces discovered by human physics research or the origin of the materials that generate these forces are the same material that moves everywhere in the universe.
It is a cosmic particle or a microscopic material neutrino that physics is studying.
This substance with a very small mass close to 0 is also the fundamental substance that makes up everything in the universe.
The elementary particles or quanta in physics are all formed by this combination of neutrinos.
The different ways and densities of this neutrino movement create various forces.
The higher the density, the stronger the force.
The density of neutrinos in the nuclear force is greater than the density of neutrinos in the electromagnetic force, and the nuclear force produced is one hundred times greater than the electromagnetic force.
The release of nuclear energy is the disintegration of these neutrino combinations and their recombination into powerful electromagnetic waves, thermal energy waves, etc.
Integral calculus should be renamed and not called integral calculus.
It should be changed to average calculation.
The indefinite integral is called the average value calculation formula.
Practical application of the formula for calculating the definite integral called the average value.
Correction
Because the result of the integral is regarded as related to X, it is understood that the integral calculates the average value of Y.
But in fact, X is directly brought into the integral calculation, and the area or volume obtained is the area or volume, so the integral cannot be considered to calculate the average value of Y.
However, it is still impossible to explain the integral principle or mathematical research on integral theory.
Actual mathematics does have a method for calculating the average value of the area enclosed by a curve that is not an elementary function.
However, the calculation method of calculating the area enclosed by a curve that is not an elementary function has inaccurate calculation results, which is different from the accurate integral calculation results.
The integral calculates the area, starting with the sum of Y and X.
But the result of evolution is not this complementary form.
As for the principle of obtaining an accurate result of area without this form of calculating area, mathematical research cannot be explained by theoretical research.
The integral calculation method can only be regarded as a technical invention.
Technology does not equal theoretical principles.
Because there is no explanation of the relevant theoretical principles for the calculation method of integrals, and it is not known what the logical idea behind the invention of this calculation method is.
Or what is the theoretical basis for the invention of this computing aspect.
An explanation of mathematical integrals cannot explain this.
The actual integral calculation cannot calculate the average value of Y.
The integral calculates the exact result of the area between Y and X.
But integrals cannot calculate the area enclosed by curves other than elementary numbers.
The actual integral calculation cannot calculate the average value of Y.
The integral calculates the exact result of the area between Y and X.
But integrals cannot calculate the area enclosed by curves other than elementary numbers.
Because the mathematical science of human research has not been able to invent a formula method for calculating the average value of the variable curve Y.
Human science does not calculate many data numbers related to average values.
Such as average speed, average acceleration, etc. What is the average value of the variables related to the average change.
Another expression and calculation method of integrals should be the calculation of average values. If human mathematical research can invent this calculation method, it will be much more useful than integrals.
For example, when calculating the area enclosed by a curve Y=X2 squared, the area obtained by integration is equal to one-third to the third power
However, in terms of practical application calculations of this kind of integration, it has no connection or logical relationship with the idea or theoretical explanation that the area surrounded by the curve is divided into many small rectangles Y which is approximately equal to the length of one side of the small rectangle at the beginning of the integration.
How can the entire area obtained by adding these small rectangles be expressed or equated with the results of integral calculation? It is impossible to see what this logical connection is.
|Archiver|手機版|導(dǎo)航中醫(yī)藥
( 官方QQ群:110873141 )
IP卡
狗仔卡
樓主
顯身卡